ANNUAL FACULTY EVALUATION FOR
Name Rank Department
TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS: Rating is based on evaluation of Part 1 of Annual Faculty Activities and
Assessment Report, Student Instructional Reports, and other available information. Note: Not all listed
items may apply, and additional items (“other”) must be specified if they apply. Note comments beside
all items that apply.
WEIGHT SELECTED BY FACULTY MEMBER (RANGE 50-65%)
Teaching Effectiveness Rating: Excellent Good Needs Improvement
(If “Needs Improvement” specify areas of improvement needed)
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON TEACHING: (attached separate page if needed)
INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY: Rating is based on evaluation of Part II of the Annual Faculty Activities
and Assessment Report. Note: Not all listed items may apply, and additional items (“other”) must be
specified if they apply. Note comments beside all items that apply.
WEIGHT SELECTED BY FACULTY MEMBER (RANGE 15-35%)
Intellectual Activity Rating Excellent Good Needs Improvement
(If “Needs Improvement”, specify areas of improvement needed)
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY: (attached separate page if needed)
UNIVERSITY SERVICE: Rating is based on evaluation of Part III of the Annual Faculty Activities and
Assessment Report. Note: Not all listed items may apply, and additional items (“other”) must be
specified if they apply. Note comments beside all items that apply.
WEIGHT SELECTED BY FACULTY MEMBER (RANGE 10-30%)
University Service Rating Excellent Good Needs Improvement
(If “Needs Improvement”, specify areas of improvement needed)
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON SERVICE: (attach separate page if needed)
Overall All Rating (If “needs improvement” specify areas of improvement needed)
Weight Rating Numerical Score for
Chosen Equivalent Category
Teaching Effectiveness
Intellectual Activity
University Service
OVERALL SCORE/EVALUATION*
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON OVERALL EVALUATION
Teaching Effectiveness
(Weight Range 50-65%)
Intellectual Activity
(Weight Range 15-35%)
University Service
(Weight Range 10-30%)
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ THIS DOCUMENT AND HAVE DISCUSSED IT WITH THE
EVALUATOR. MY SIGNATURE CONNOTES NEITHER AGREEMENT NOR
DISAGREEMENT WITH THE RATINGS AND COMMENTS HEREON. I UNDERSTAND
THAT I MAY ALSO DISCUSS THIS DOCUMENT WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF THE
UNIVERSITY’S ADMINISTRATION.
Signature of Faculty Member Date Signature of Evaluator Date
Printed Name Printed Name
*Within each category Excellent receives a score of 3, Good receives a score of 2, and Needs Improvement receives a score of 1.
An Overall Score of 2.7 or higher receives an overall evaluation of Excellent/High Merit, an Overall Score of 2.65-1.85 receives
an overall evaluation of Good/Merit, and an Overall Score of 1.80 or lower receives an overall evaluation of Needs
Improvement/No Merit.