Administrative Review - Non-Teaching Faculty
Job Title:
Supervising Administrator:
Date:
Department:
Work Location:
Tenure Status:
Unit Members Name:
Evaluation Orientation:
Evaluation Team Review
Conference:
Faculty observations were conducted by the evaluation team members and are attached:
Student evaluations were conducted as a part of this evaluation process. Those
evaluations along with summary of student comments received for this faculty member
are attached.
Administrative Review:
Performance Rating - Any "Needs Improvement" or "Unsatisfactory" rating will require a written explanation and a suggestion for improvement. Ratings are
listed as Satisfactory, Needs Improvement and Unsatisfactory.
Depth and Breadth of knowledge.
Rating:
Rating:
Methods and techniques used.
Rating:
Communication and listening skills.
Rating:
Rapport with students and colleagues.
Participates in departmental and other required campus meetings
Rating:
Observes daily work schedule and is prepared for academic, career, and personal counseling.
Rating:
Maintain currency in field; some examples of activities may include, but are not limited to,
attending conferences, training, presenting papers, publishing, taking courses approved by the
Salary Advancement Committee or internet research.
Rating:
Participates in graduation ceremonies.
Rating:
Evaluation Time lines:
