Other “red flag” areas for auditors are completeness and timeliness of certification. Late,
unsigned, or missing effort reports will likely raise questions. Effort reports that appear to have
been signed in batches can be problematic. “Corrected” effort reports may draw an auditor’s
attention; this is especially true when the “corrected” effort certifications lead to an unusually
large number of payroll cost transfers. Employees who need to correct effort certifications
should keep meticulous documentation in order to be able to explain why the correction was
necessary. This explanation may be required in an audit conducted years later when memories
have faded, and it may have to be delivered to potentially skeptical federal auditors and
officials. Finally, simply “correcting” effort certifications near the end of the term of a
sponsored project in order to “spend out” unused funds presents such egregious non-
compliance that criminal charges may be made under the False Claims Act.
14. What are the potential consequences of inaccurate or non-timely effort certification?
Effort certifications provide the basis for institutional claims for reimbursement of direct and
indirect charges under a federal grant or contract. Inaccurate or fraudulent reports may give
rise to a False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq.) lawsuit. An individual who is found to have
violated this Act can be subjected to civil penalties of not less than $5,000 nor more than
$10,000 for each violation; to criminal sanctions, if the violation was willful, of imprisonment
for up to five years and fines of up to $25,000; and to an order to reimburse the government
for treble the damages sustained by the government because of the individual’s act. There
have been instances in which individual researchers have been required to make substantial
civil monetary reimbursements to the federal government because of their involvement in
improper effort certifications. Of course, the institution can suffer as well from False Claims Act
violations by its employees. Institutional sanctions may include the payment of costly
settlements or even debarment from participating in federally funded research. The issue of
compliance with effort certification requirements should always be approached with these
potentially heavy sanctions for violations in mind.
Every institution that receives federal grant or contract funds must abide by the same rules,
including implementing an accurate effort certification system and ensuring that the federal
government is not overbilled for effort that did not occur. Auditors may elect to review the
effort certification system of any institution at any time, regardless of the type of institution or
the size of its sponsored programs portfolio. Although the small size of an institution or a
relatively modest volume of federally funded research may lower the probability of an effort
certification audit, if it should occur, the magnitude of the impact of audit disallowances or a
False Claims Act suit would be substantially greater, as small institutions generally do not have
large monetary reserves from which to pay for disallowances, fines, settlements, and attorneys’
fees. Thus, any institution, regardless of size, is remiss if effort certification is not taken
seriously and is not done in a way that satisfies federal regulations and ensures that the federal
government is not overcharged for personnel time on sponsored projects.