APPLICATION FOR PUD MAP AMENDMENT
Development Services Department ♦ 389 Spruce Street, Morgantown, WV 26505 Page 1 of 2
www.morgantownwv.gov ♦ 304.284.7431 Form Rev. 20180701
OFFICE USE
CASE NO.
(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN INK) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Fee: $2,500.00 [Z-RZ]
I. OWNER / APPLICANT
Name:
Phone:
Mailing
Address:
Mobile:
Email:
II. AGENT / CONTACT INFORMATION
Name:
Phone:
Mailing
Address:
Mobile:
Email:
Mailings:
Send all correspondence to (check one): Applicant OR Agent/Contact
III. PROPERTY
Street Address (if assigned):
Tax Map(s) #:
Parcel(s) #:
Size (sq. ft. or acres):
Current Zoning Classification:
Proposed Zoning Classification:
Current Land Use:
Proposed Land Use*:
*The Planning Commission does not take proposed use into consideration. The question is asked merely for
staff to determine if the proposed district allows the intended use.
IV. ATTEST
I hereby certify that I am the owner of record of the named property, or that this application is authorized by the
owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his/her authorized agent
and I agree to conform to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction, whether specified herein or not. I certify that I
have read and examined this document and know the same to be true and correct. The undersigned has the
power to authorize and does hereby authorize City of Morgantown representatives on official business to enter
the subject property as necessary to process the application and enforce related approvals and conditions.
Type/Print Name of Applicant/Agent
Type/Print Name of Applicant/Agent
Date
Street
City
Zip
State
Street
City
State
Zip
Finance Rcv’d
APPLICATION FOR PUD MAP AMENDMENT
Development Services Department ♦ 389 Spruce Street, Morgantown, WV 26505 Page 2 of 2
www.morgantownwv.gov ♦ 304.284.7431 Form Rev. 20180701
OFFICE USE
CASE NO.
ADDENDUM A - PUD Map Amendment Process
The timeframe provided below is intended to assist developers considering pursuing a PUD. Specific
dates are subject to change due to the scale/scope of the proposed PUD, changes in meeting dates,
holidays, revisions required by Staff, etc. PUD applications are processed by the Development Services
Department, reviewed by the Planning Commission, and approved by City Council by ordinance. The
PUD process includes the approval of a PUD Development Plan, which may be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Commission OR administrative (building permit phase) if the Planning Commission
delegates same to City Administration. The timeframe illustrated below is specific to the PUD Outline
Plan approval process and does not address PUD Development Plan approval, given potential variables.
Staff
Consultation and
Pre-application
Conference
Staff
Technical Review
Committee
Planning
Commission
Agenda
Deadline
Planning
Commission
Ward Meeting
Planning
Commission
Public Hearing and
Recommendation
City Council
Committee of the
Whole
City Council
First Reading
City Council
Public Hearing and
Second Reading
Month A
Week 1
Complete
PUD
Outline Plan
must be
submitted
prior to
deadline
Week 2
2
nd
TUE
Week 3
Week 4
4
th
TUE
Week 5
Month B
Week 1
1
st
FRI
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
At least 7
days prior
to PC
hearing
Week 5
Month C
Week 1
Week 2
2
nd
THU
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Last TUE
Month D
Week 1
1
st
TUE
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 1
1
st
TUE
CITY OF MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OUTLINE PLAN
RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK Page 1 of 5
Development Services Department
This document is a resource to developers pursuing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and seeking
assistance with the preparation of the PUD Outline Plan element. This information may not be considered
or construed as replacing or supplanting specific content requirements and standards enumerated in
Article 1357 of the City’s Planning and Zoning Code.
The PUD Outline Plan should be approached in the most descriptive and illustrative method necessary to
meet or exceed the minimum specifications enumerated in Article 1357 of the City’s Planning and Zoning
Code. The uses and standards expressed in the PUD Outline Plan constitute the use and development
regulations for the PUD site in lieu of the regulations of the underlying district. However, if the PUD
Outline Plan is silent on a particular land use, development standard, or other specification of the Zoning
Ordinance, the standard of the underlying district or the applicable regulations shall apply. The applicant
is therefore advised to systematically review and understand applicable regulations associated with the
PUD site in preparing the PUD Outline Plan.
Where there are environmentally sensitive features on the site or the PUD Development Plan is expected
to be complex, or there are other important planning implications involved, the Planning Commission may
reserve the right to review the PUD Development Plan.
Although not guaranteed, the more thorough, illustrative, and inclusive the PUD Outline Plan is prepared
and presented, the more confident the Planning Commission might be in the planning, deliverables, and
timelines of the proposal so that PUD Development Plan review and approval could be delegated to City
Administration. For instance, PUD Outline Plans that include minimum PUD Development Plan elements
could aid the Planning Commission in deciding to delegate PUD Development Plan review and approval
to City Administration.
ANTICIPATED PUD ADVANTAGES RECOMMENDED PLAN ELEMENT
PUD applicants are strongly encouraged to include an “Anticipated PUD Advantages” element in the PUD
Outline Plan, organized in the following framework, stating the specific advantage, and comprehensively
addressing, in narrative and illustrative form, how the proposed PUD will offer one or more of the
following advantages as relevant.
1. Serve to implement the goals, objectives, and strategies of The Morgantown Comprehensive
Plan specific to the district or neighborhood in which the PUD is to be located;
2. Apply the design principles of new urbanism, neo-traditionalism, and other emerging smart
growth principles, urban development patterns and best management practices;
3. Promote development patterns that maximize compatibility of differing adjacent land uses to
avoid the necessity of extensive buffering;
4. Enhance the appearance of neighborhoods by conserving areas of special natural beauty, steep
slopes, ecological importance, flood prone areas, and natural green spaces where appropriate,
while understanding that land within urban areas is best suited for urban densities and
development patterns;
CITY OF MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OUTLINE PLAN
RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK Page 2 of 5
Development Services Department
5. Counteract poor urban design and mitigate congestion on streets;
6. Promote architecture that is compatible with the community vernacular, and/or the
surroundings;
7. Promote design principles that allow differing types of land uses to coexist while preserving
property values and minimizing potential negative consequences;
8. Promote appropriate urban densities that will help make alternative forms of transportation
economically and socially feasible; and
9. Promote and protect the environmental integrity of the site and its surroundings by providing
suitable design responses to the specific environmental constraints of the site and surrounding
area.
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHARACTER OF THE PUD REQUIRED PLAN ELEMENT
In addition to the requisite PUD Outline Plan drawings enumerated in Section 1357.04(B), the PUD
applicant must include an explanation of the character of the PUD and the reasons why it has been
planned to take advantage of the flexibility of the Planning and Zoning Code. The written statement must
address, at least, each of the following elements, which should be organized in the following framework.
1. Objectives. A specific explanation of how the proposed PUD meets the objectives of all adopted
land use policies which affect the land in question (e.g., 2013 Comprehensive Plan Update, 2010
Downtown Strategic Plan Update, Small Area Studies, Planning and Zoning Code, etc.).
This element can and should be approached as a summary of the more detailed information
presented in the “Municipal Review Considerations” element described below.
2. Ownership. A statement of present and proposed ownership of all land within the project
including the beneficial owners of a land trust.
3. Scheduling. Time of proposed development indicating:
a. Stages in which the project will be built, including the area, density, use, public facilities, and
open space to be developed with each stage. Each stage shall be described and mapped; and,
b. Projected dates for beginning and completion of each stage of land development.
Scheduling information described should be flexible enough and phased to safeguard
development delivery, but realistic enough to ensure accountability.
4. Proposed Uses.
a. Residential Uses: type, gross area, architectural concepts (narrative, sketch, or representative
photo), number of units, bedroom breakdown, and proposed occupancy limits for each
residential component;
CITY OF MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OUTLINE PLAN
RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK Page 3 of 5
Development Services Department
b. Nonresidential Uses: specific nonresidential uses, including gross floor areas (GFA),
architectural concepts (narrative, sketch, or representative photo), and building heights.
Uses permitted in a PUD may be any use that is found in the Planning and Zoning Code in any
district, subject to the approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The uses
expressed in the PUD Outline Plan constitute the use regulations for the PUD site in lieu of the
regulations for the underlying district. If the Outline Plan is silent on a particular land use, the
standard of the underlying district shall apply.
5. Facilities Plan. Preliminary concepts and feasibility reports for:
a. Streets, roadways and bikeways.
b. Sidewalks and pedestrian pathways.
c. Water supply system.
d. Sanitary sewers.
e. Stormwater management.
f. Public utilities.
g. Streetscaping, furniture and lighting.
6. Traffic Analysis. The Planning Director or the Municipal Planning Commission, shall require study
of the traffic impact caused by the proposed PUD and/or any measures proposed to mitigate that
impact. Such study shall be conducted by a licensed traffic or transportation engineer.
The applicant’s traffic or transportation engineer must first meet with the City Engineer, and
together with the West Virginia Division of Highways (WVDOH) if applicable, to consult on and
approve the traffic impact study scope of work (e.g., extent of area to be studied; study horizon;
analysis time periods; data collection; trip generation; modal split; trip distribution; trip
assignment; traffic analysis; traffic impact mitigation thresholds; etc.). Continued consultation
with the City and WVDOH, if applicable, is expected during the analysis and preliminary
development of findings and recommendations.
MUNICIPAL REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS RECOMMENDED PLAN ELMENT
In their consideration of a PUD Outline Plan, the Planning Division in its report to the Planning Commission,
the Planning Commission in their recommendation to City Council, and the City Council in its decision, is
required to evaluate the project in light of as many of the following objectives as may be relevant to the
specific proposals. PUD applicants are strongly encouraged to include a “Municipal Review
Considerations element in the PUD Outline Plan, organized in the following framework, stating the
specific objective, and comprehensively addressing, in narrative and illustrative form, as many of these
objectives as relevant.
1. The extent to which the PUD meets the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, the Comprehensive
Plan, and any other adopted planning objectives of the City of Morgantown.
CITY OF MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OUTLINE PLAN
RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK Page 4 of 5
Development Services Department
2. The extent to which the proposed plan meets the requirements, standards, and stated purpose
of the PUD regulations.
3. The extent to which the proposed plan departs from the zoning and subdivision regulations
otherwise applicable to the subject property, including but not limited to, the density, dimension,
bulk, use, required improvements, and construction and design standards and the reasons why
such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest.
4. The proposal will not be injurious to the public health, safety, and general welfare.
5. The physical design of the PUD and the extent to which it makes adequate provision for public
services, provides adequate control over vehicular traffic and promotes alternative forms of
transportation, provides for and protects designated permanent open space, and furthers the
amenities of urban ambience, light and air, recreation and visual enjoyment.
6. The relationship and compatibility of the proposed plan to the adjacent properties and
neighborhood, and whether the proposed plan would substantially interfere with the use or
diminish the value of adjacent properties and neighborhoods.
7. The desirability of the proposed plan to the City of Morgantown's physical development, tax base
and economic well-being. At the discretion of the Planning Commission and City Council, special
consideration in the form of increased development flexibility may be given to projects that are
intended to rehabilitate or replace dilapidated areas, brownfields, or other areas of general
visual or economic blight. Such special consideration shall not be granted to projects intended
for construction on lands that consist of 60 percent or more previously undeveloped lands.
8. The proposal will not cause undue traffic congestion, and can be adequately served by existing
or programmed public facilities and services.
9. The proposal preserves significant ecological, natural, historical, and architectural resources to
the extent possible.
10. The proposal will enhance the appearance, image, function, and economic sustainability of the
community at large.
11. Projects which are designed to a more human scale, support multi-modal transportation options,
preserve useful open space, provide significant amenities to residents, and incorporate
architectural detailing, massing and scale that is consistent with historical community norms
shall have a significant advantage in the review process over those that merely seek to maximize
inappropriate forms of density, circumvent customary development standards, or promote a
pattern of development that can be generally recognized as “urban sprawl,” as defined in the
definition section of the Zoning Ordinance. Projects that fail to achieve these objectives will likely
result in a recommendation for denial by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission.
12. The proposal makes reasonable accommodations in housing, recreational amenities, and
pedestrian facilities for individuals with disabilities.
CITY OF MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OUTLINE PLAN
RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK Page 5 of 5
Development Services Department
13. The proposal dedicates and provides a percentage of the total number of dwelling units to be
offered at sale or rental prices deemed affordable to individuals of low and moderate income,
as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Generally, between 3
to 5 percent of all units should meet this goal.
14. For PUD’s containing only residential uses, clustering of units should be utilized (and may be
required by the City) in order to preserve meaningful open space and/or recreational amenities
for the residents. In addition, such projects shall be required to provide a mixture of different
dwelling types and sizes. Examples of dwelling types include townhouses, row houses, patio
homes, zero lot line houses, single-family detached housing, apartments, duplexes,
condominiums, etc.
The following terms are defined in Section 1329.02 of the City’s Planning and Zoning Code.
NEO-TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT An approach to land-use planning and urban design that promotes
the building of neighborhoods with a mix of uses and housing types, disciplined architectural variety, a
central public gathering place, interconnecting streets and alleys, and edges defined by greenbelts or
boulevards. The basic goal is integration of the activities of potential residents with work, shopping,
recreation, and transit all within reasonable walking distance.
SMART GROWTH Planning, regulatory, and development practices and techniques founded upon and
promoting the following principles: (1) using land resources more efficiently through compact building
forms, infill development, and modernization in street and parking standards in order to lessen land
consumption and preserve natural resources; (2) supporting the location of stores, offices, residences,
schools, recreational spaces, and other public facilities within walking distance of each other in compact
neighborhoods that are designed to provide alternate opportunities for easier movement and
interaction; (3) providing a variety of housing choices so that the young and old, single persons and
families, and those of varying economic ability may find places to live; (4) supporting walking, cycling,
and transit as attractive alternatives to driving; providing alternate routes that disperse, rather than
concentrate, traffic congestion; and lowering traffic speeds in neighborhoods; (5) connecting
infrastructure and development decisions to minimize future costs by creating neighborhoods where
more people use existing services and facilities; and by integrating land use and development with
transit routes and stations; and (6) improving the development review process and development
standards so that the developers are encouraged to apply the principles stated above.
The definition for the following term is provided by the Congress for New Urbanism.
1
NEW URBANISM The process of reintegrating the components of modern life housing, workplace,
shopping, and recreation into compact, pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use neighborhoods linked by
transit and set in a larger regional open space framework. Initially dubbed “neotraditional planning,”
the principles that define new urbanism can be applied successfully to infill and redevelopment sites
within existing urbanized areas.
1
Davidson, M., & Dolnick, F. (2004). A planners dictionary. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association, Planning
Advisory Service.