1
ADA TECHNICAL INFEASIBILITY FORM
revised 06/2020
PROJECT AND LOCATION INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME:
WIN:
PROJECT SCOPE:
SUBMITTED BY:
PROGRAM:
DATE:
CURB RAMP ID:
LOCATION:
(provide intersecting roadway names, quadrant, node, and any other information necessary)
REASON FULL COMPLIANCE IS INFEASIBLE
:
(check appropriate category and provide explanation)
Structural (Bridge beams, buildings, basements, foundations, etc.)
Utilities
(Project scope would not otherwise require utility relocation)
Historic Feature (Historic buildings, districts, monuments, etc.)
Steep Existing Grades (Profile grade exceeds ramp running slope or cross slope max.)
Right of Way (Project scope would not otherwise require Right of Way)
Drainage
Other
This form is used to document curb ramps on MaineDOT highways that cannot comply with current
standards. Nonstandard curb ramps may be identified during preliminary design, final design, or
construction. A separate form must be completed for each non-compliant curb ramp. Instructions for
completing the form are included on Page 3 of this form, titled “Instructions for ADA Technical
Infeasibility Form"
2
CURB RAMP ELEMENT NON-COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST: (complete for each non‐compliant element)
CURB RAMP ELEMENT STANDARD
PROPOSED LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE
Running Slope
Max. 8.33% (1:12)
Cross Slope
Max. 2% (1:50)
Clear Width
Min. 4 feet
Counter Slope
Max. 5% (1:20)
(Adjacent surface flush with
ramp)
Flared Sides
Max. 10% (1:10)
Turning Space (may include
detectable warnings)
Min. 4 feet by 4 feet
(Max. 2% (1:50) in
any direction)
Clear Space
Min. 4 feet by 4 feet
Detectable Warnings
Req'd at traffic controlled inter-
sections and mid-block crossings.
FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
This facility could not be made compliant within the scope of the project but it should be
placed on the ADA Transition Plan to be made compliant in the future.
The constraints causing the curb ramp to be non-compliant are not a condition of project
scope. It cannot be made compliant.
APPROVAL AND FILING
This form should be submitted to the appropriate Program Manager or Region Manager and the
Title II ADA Coordinator. Approval may be granted at the program or region level or forwarded
to the Engineering Council for further review.
APPROVAL: DATE:
APPROVAL: DATE:
click to sign
signature
click to edit
3
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADA TECHNICAL INFEASIBILITY FORM
Project Name: Name of project in the work plan
WIN: MaineDOT Work Identification Number
Project Scope: Type of project i.e.mill and fill” or “intersection safety improvements”
Submitted By: Name of the person submitting the form
Program: i.e. Highway, Bridge, Multimodal
Date: Date that the form was submitted
Curb Ramp ID: Most curb ramps have been identified as assets on Map Viewer. Identify
the curb ramp by number if available. If there is no curb ramp listed at that location enter
N/A.
PROJECT AND LOCATION INFORMATION
LOCATION
Provide a location for the ramp, if none exists in the data or if you are adding a new curb
ramp. Please put as much information as possible. Intersection, Lat/Long coordinates,
orientation, etc.
REASONS FULL COMPLIANCE IS INFEASIBLE
The 2011 PROWAG "recognize[s] that it is not always possible for altered elements, spaces, or
facilities to fully comply with new construction requirements because of existing physical
constraints. Where existing physical constraints make it impracticable for altered elements, spaces,
or facilities to fully comply with the requirements for new construction, compliance is required to the
extent feasible within the scope of the project. "
Structural: Existing structures may limit the ability to adjust grade to comply with maximum
accessible slopes. For example, the elevation of a ramp crossing over the top of an existing physical
or natural structure will need to be higher than the elevation of the structure. This "fixed"
elevation may necessitate a curb ramp slope exceeding the maximum compliant slope.
Utilities: Utility infrastructure both above and below ground will often impact the ability to reach curb
ramp compliance. Relocating utilities may be outside the project scope (LCP or CPR project.)
Historic Features: It may not be possible to build a fully compliant facility without negatively
affecting the existence or integrity of an historic feature. For example, if replacing a non-compliant
curb ramp with a ramp that must be extended to meet slope would require the removal of an
historic stone retaining wall, the extended the curb ramp would not need to meet compliance, but
slope should be met to the maximum extent feasible.
4
Steep Existing Grades: Existing grade may be too steep or grade separations too great to comply
with the maximum slopes. A curb ramp should not exceed 15 feet to meet the maximum 8.3% slope
requirements. If a compliant ramp cannot be furnished with the available space, a ramp with the
minimum practical slope should be installed.
Right of Way: If adequate public right‐of‐way cannot be acquired, permission to access private
property is not granted by a property owner to construct a facility, or if acquiring property is outside
the scope of the project, it may not be possible to achieve full compliance.
Drainage: Standing or frozen water can make a facility inaccessible, unsafe and prone to faster
deterioration. If the maximum compliant slope of a curb ramp is not adequate to drain in certain
conditions or will impede the drainage of an area, a slope exceeding the maximum may be
necessary. If building a fully compliant ramp necessitates moving a closed drainage structure and it
is beyond the project scope it should be noted.
Other: There may be unique situations found that should be noted. Please refer to above definitions
as much as possible.
CURB RAMP NON-COMPLIANCE CHECK LIST
The Curb Ramp Non-Compliance Check List contains curb ramp elements that require compliance,
the ADA or MaineDOT Standards that determine compliance and the proposed level of compliance
that should reflect the level that was achieved to the maximum extent feasible. For example, if a
counter slope could only be reduced to a 6% slope than the proposed level of compliance should
state the level that was achieved (6%). The ramp may have more than one element that is not
compliant.
FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
If the curb ramp cannot be made compliant within the scope of the project, but should and could be
made compliant in future projects, it should be on the MaineDOT ADA Transition Plan to be made
compliant in the future. Check the first check box. For instance, if the project scope was a CPR and
a curb ramp could have been made compliant with right-of-way acquisition it will need to be
addressed in the future.
If the constraint(s) causing the facility to be noncompliant are not a condition of project scope, and
cannot be made compliant in the foreseeable future, check the second box. For example, if a curb
ramp's running slope exceeds the maximum compliant slope because there is inadequate space
between the curb and a building, the constraint is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.
APPROVAL AND FILING
If an element does not meet ADA minimum standards, submit an ADA Statement of Technical
Infeasibility request to the appropriate Program Manager or Region Engineer and the Title II ADA
Coordinator. Approval may be granted at the program level, by region or forwarded to the
Engineering Council for further review. A completed and approved form should be sent to the ADA
Coordinator.