Men’s Health Training Guide 5
multi-joint lifts. They know
their arms aren’t going to grow
out of proportion to the bigger,
stronger muscles in their back,
chest, and shoulders.
Why? Allow me to digress
for a moment: A lot of experts
these days subscribe to the phi-
losophy that size and strength
are separate phenomena—that
strength doesn’t serve size and
size doesn’t serve strength. They
say that to optimize either—
to get really big or truly strong—
you should never train for both.
I disagree. A bigger muscle
can produce more force. A
stronger muscle allows you to
work with more weight, which,
in turn, builds a bigger muscle.
The key is to hit a balance
between training for strength
and training for size, whether
it’s in a short program like this
or in years-long training cycles.
I’m not saying that physique
athletes who focus exclusively
on size by doing high-repetition,
high-volume workouts are nec-
essarily wrong, or that power-
lifters who do most of their work
with heavy weights and low reps
should spend more time doing
dumbbell curls and cable exten-
sions. Advanced lifters know
what works for them, just as I
know what works for me.
I also know what works for
my clients who have goals like
yours—specically to build big-
ger arms, but generally to look
more like someone who lifts than
you do now. Just about every
well-developed guy I’ve ever
met has trained for both strength
and size. Many also trained for
other goals, like performance
in a sport. I think you’d be hard-
pressed to nd a successful
bodybuilder who didn’t spend
some time under the bar work-
ing toward a one-rep max in the
bench press, or a successful
strongman who hasn’t done his
share of curls, or a successful
athlete who hasn’t done some of
both, even if neither could be
linked to improved perfor-
mance in his sport.
You’ll also notice that the
program includes squats, dead-
lifts, and leg presses, with mul-
tiple variations on the rst two.
If you wonder why they’re in an
arm-building program, just
Google “skipped leg day.” The
guy whose upper body looks
like an “after” picture while his
legs look like the “before” is
even more of a cautionary
example than the one who uses
heavier weights for curls than
he does for presses or rows.
I’m joking, kind of. The real
reason is that life is a total-
body activity. Humans are built
for activities like running,
climbing, kicking, and throwing.
All involve the coordinated
transfer of force from arms to
legs or legs to arms, with your
core muscles in between. That’s
why foundational strength
movements like squats and
deadlifts contribute to bigger
arms while isolated arm exer-
cises don’t do anything to help
your lower body.
Picture two lifters who’re
physically similar—roughly the
same height, weight, and age.
One focuses on strength with-
out any direct arm work. The
other does direct arm work
without any squats or deadlifts.
Chances are the rst guy can
curl more than the second one,
despite never practicing the
exercise. But there’s no way the
second guy can deadlift as
much as the rst one.
Put simply: Strength mat-
ters. If all else is equal, the
stronger athlete will be better
than the weaker one, and the
stronger lifter will have a bet-
ter chance to get bigger than
the weaker one (if he isn’t big-
ger already).
Meet Your CoaCh
Dan Trink, cscs,
is a strength coach, personal trainer,
nutritional consultant, and founder of Fortitude Strength
Club in New York City. He holds over a dozen itness
and nutrition certiications, and has written hundreds
of training articles for magazines and websites such as
TNation, Men’s Fitness, Muscle & Fitness, LiveStrong,
Greatist, and The Huington Post. He is also the author
of “High Intensity 300” and has presented at interna-
tional itness conferences. As an athlete, Dan competes
in Masters Weightlifting in the 105 kilogram (231 pound)
weight class, representing the United States in local,
national, and international competitions.