Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College
Board of Governors DRAFT Minutes
Meeting of June 16, 2020
Page 2 of 14
many ways. To name a few, seniority rights, bumping rights, and preferred recall was lost
in the event of a reduction-in-force; new exempt employees would be hired as non-
classified, and current exempt employees will remain as classified unless the position goes
through a classification review. Ms. Miller explained why the classified status is important
to staff. As a classified employee, there is a progressive discipline that Southern follows
as stated in the Employee Handbook. It is required for a classified employee to be made
aware of an undesirable behavior and be given an opportunity correct that behavior. If the
behavior is not corrected, or the employee demonstrates additional unacceptable related
or unrelated behavior, a letter of warning will be issued to the employee. Failure of the
employee to modify behaviors to an acceptable level will result in further disciplinary action,
up to suspension and/or termination of employment. Non-classified staff are considered “at
will and pleasure” employees. They do not have that guaranteed job security of being
informed of an undesirable behavior or action and being provided an opportunity to correct
that behavior. Ms. Miller conveyed the main concerns of staff are the COVID pandemic and
the safety of students and employees; the findings of the HLC Focused Report; and the
Classified Staff Salary Schedule. She informed Board members that SCP-2825, Salary
Administration, has not been revised to reflect the legislative changes of 2017. However,
the policy is scheduled for review during the upcoming academic year. In 2018, Southern
brought its employees up to the minimum on the salary schedule by providing a 5% salary
increase, with a minimum increase of $2,160, whichever was greatest. Currently, staff have
no guidelines to progress through the salary schedule quartiles to receive an increase in
salary and would like for guidelines to be established. Following the presentation, Chair
Heston called for questions. Hearing none, she thanked and commended both Ms. Miller
and Mr. Gray for their service and dedication to Southern, and for their leadership of the
Classified Staff Council.
5. HLC Institutional Response Update
Mr. Bill Alderman, Accreditation Liaison Officer, and Ms. Linda Vinson, Higher Education
Consultant, provided Board members with a status report on the Institutional Response to
the HLC. Mr. Alderman acknowledged as a Board, they were excited to bring a new
President aboard to delve straight into the Focused Report addressing the HLC
recommendations and rationale. President Alderman immediately began arranging
meetings and working with Dr. Corley Dennison, Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs at the
West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission, and also secured Ms. Vinson as a
consultant. Mr. Alderman informed Board members that he has been in contact with
Southern’s HLC Liaison, Dr. Karen Solomon, multiple times since mid-April discussing plans
on constructing the Institutional Response Report. Discussions during the meetings with
Dr. Solomon included specific rationale on the Team’s recommendations for Criterion 1-5
and all criterion components listed specifically to A or B or C and B, but also addressed
Criterion 5C and D expectations for improvement. Throughout the past two months, Mr.
Alderman has consistently referenced pages 17-21 of the Team’s final report, and Dr.
Solomon confirmed those pages needs to be our focus.
In referencing Core Component 2A, Mr. Alderman stated that Southern has developed a
systematic and consistent process for documenting conventional and tested experience for
faculty credentials. Plans are to monitor this process as new faculty, both full time and
adjunct, come on board. The Human Resource’s Director, Doug Kennedy, will work
collaboratively with the two School Deans as well as with the Interim Vice President for