2/20/2017
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
Name
ADW Clark Nexsen
McMillan,
Pazdan and
Smith
Mosley
Architects
Novus Prudhomme Samsel Peacock
Location
Charlotte, NC Asheville, NC Asheville, NC Charlotte, NC Asheville, NC HVL., NC Asheville, NC HVL., NC
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
24 20 25 21 22 20 22 20
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
24 20 25 22 22 20 24 20
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
25 20 25 25 25 25 24 20
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
25 20 22 25 24 20 24 15
SUB-TOTAL
98 80 97 93 93 85 94 75
RANK
1 7 244 6 3 8
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
23 15 15 23 15 15 15 15
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
24 23 20 23 20 15 18 20
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
23 23 20 23 20 20 20 20
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
23 20 20 24 15 15 15 15
SUB-TOTAL
93 81 75 93 70 65 68 70
RANK
1 3 415 8 7 5
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
22 22 22 25 20 10 22 20
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
25 22 25 22 20 20 22 20
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
25 25 25 25 20 20 20 20
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
15 17 10 25 22 15 10 22
SUB-TOTAL
87 86 82 97 82 65 74 82
RANK
2 3 414 8 7 4
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
25 25 25 25 24 20 20 15
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
24 23 25 23 21 19 19 15
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
24 23 24 23 23 22 22 15
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
24 23 24 23 22 22 22 15
SUB-TOTAL
97 94 98 94 90 83 83 60
RANK
2 3 135 6 6 8
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
23 21 22 22 22 22 23 23
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
23 21 22 22 21 18 22 21
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
22 22 22 21 21 20 22 21
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
21 21 21 18 22 20 23 22
SUB-TOTAL
89 85 87 83 86 80 90 87
RANK
2 6 375 8 1 3
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
23 21 22 22 21 23 22 20
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
23 22 22 23 20 22 22 18
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
th
is p
roject (25)
24 20 23 22 23 21 23 20
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
23 23 22 23 20 22 20 20
SUB-TOTAL
93 86 89 90 84 88 87 78
RANK
1 6 327 4 5 8
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
25 25 25 25 20 15 25 20
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
25 25 25 25 15 10 20 20
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
25 20 15 25 20 15 20 15
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
25 25 25 20 20 20 20 15
SUB-TOTAL
100 95 90 95 75 60 85 70
RANK
1 2 426 8 5 7
Understanding of the City’s required tasks and needs as
demonstrated in the qualifications statement (25)
25 25 24 25 25 20 20 15
Experience with similar projects comparable in type, size, and
complexity (25)
25 25 20 25 25 15 18 10
Qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the work with
this project (25)
25 25 25 25 25 15 20 15
Demonstrated ability of the Consultant to perform high
quality work, to control costs, and meet
project schedules (25)
24 24 23 24 22 15 20 10
SUB-TOTAL
99 99 92 99 97 65 78 50
RANK
1 1 514 7 6 8
AVERAGED RANK
1.38 3.88 3.25 2.63 5.00 6.88 5.00 6.38
Justin WardJohn Connet Tracey Cox
Evaluation Criteria
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES QUALIFICATION STATEMENT EVALUATION
Brent DetwilerLee SmithAlvin FullerBrian PahleTom Wooten