CURRENT GUIDANCE
Link to: 'Best Practice Guidance to Planning Policy Stat. 18 (PPS18)' shadow flicker text:
'10 x Rotor Diameter' rule-of-thumb
Companion Guide to PPS18 states:
"At distances greater than 10 rotor diameters from a turbine, the potential for shadow
flicker is very low."
Q4: Do you consider the '10 x Rotor Diameter' rule an appropriate assessment area for
shadow flicker reports?
Q5: Would an alternative calculation method for the assessment area be preferable to
the '10 x Rotor Diameter' rule?
Other
Shadow Flicker Effect outside properties
Best Practice Guidance to PPS18 states:
"[Shadow Flicker Effect] only occurs inside buildings where the flicker appears through a
narrow window opening."
Q6: Should shadow flicker assessments be limited to the interior of residential buildings?
Q7: If 'No', should the following receptors be included in shadow flicker assessments?
Road users
Footpath users
Bridleway users
Non-residential properties (eg. offices, warehouses, etc)
Other receptors -
please specify in 'Other'
Other
Quantitative Guidance
In recent years, regulations have emerged in other countries proposing a quantitative
approach to assessing shadow flicker. This approach sets a limit on the duration that a
receptor can be exposed to shadow flicker effects. Best Practice Guidance to PPS18
recommends a quantitative approach for assessing shdow flicker impact on offices and
dwellings adjacent to wind energy developments.
Best Practice Guidance to PPS18 states:
"It is recommended that shadow flicker at neighbouring offices and dwellings within500m
should not exceed 30 hours per year or 30 minutes per day."
Q9: What is your opinion on the value of adopting quantitative guidance on shadow
flicker effect?
Please continue to next page...
Please comment
Q10: Please include any other comments relating to amendments / omissions / additions
to current UK guidance below.
Please comment
Q8: Please elaborate on your reason(s) for including additional receptors in shadow
flicker assessments.
Please elaborate