46
Proposed project based expenditures (both IT and non-IT) have their business cases assessed by the
Finance Committee, which either rejects/approves or makes recommendations to the EB depending on the
level of expenditure involved. Business cases comply with the DfT Investment Appraisal Framework,
through compliance with the ‘Green Book’ and use of the best practice 5-case business model advocated
by OGC and HM Treasury.
The COPPE then monitors and tracks programmes through to closure, providing Programme Delivery
Board, and EB if significant enough, with advice on project and business decisions, including potentially
the cancellation of individual projects if business case changes or risk appraisals (both updated regularly)
indicate this to be appropriate. If cancelled prior to successful completion, such projects are fully
disclosed in the annual accounts. The Tracking Vehicles Through the Trade (TV3T) project cancellation
has been so disclosed in the current year accounts. Tier 1 and 2 projects have their business cases
considered and budgets approved, together with monthly progress reporting and monitoring by DfT and
MFSG Boards.
Shared Services Arrangements
Since April 2007 the DVLA Finance, Payroll and HR transactional support functions have been provided
by the Shared Service Centre based in Swansea. Responsibility for the governance of the centre and line
responsibility for SSC management passed directly to the DfT Director General for Resources in October
2008. Each organisation has its own control responsibility and IA processes for those internal elements of
the transaction streams that remain outside the SSC and each Accounting Officer has individual
responsibility to ensure that the two sets of controls provide an environment of overall appropriate control
for their own organisation.
The DfT Shared Services Director has provided three Assurance Reports during the year on the internal
controls operating at the SSC. These present an improved position during the year and, at the year end, a
position has been achieved where the internal controls over transactions have reached acceptable levels.
Any control weaknesses within the SSC systems during the year were compensated for by additional
DVLA controls and have had no direct material impact on the financial transactions and the accuracy of
reporting for year-end accounts production. DVLA and DfT Internal Audit have undertaken assurance
work on the operation of business unit and SSC elements respectively of the controls in operation so that
DVLA has been able to form a view on the effectiveness of the control regime overall.
The action plan to improve SSC financial controls agreed in 2008 has now been substantially delivered.
It became apparent during the year that specific reconciliations (mainly in respect of payroll transactions)
were not being undertaken in a timely manner, but these were brought up to date by the year end,
although some earlier reconciling items have not been fully cleared. However, there were no significant
items emerging during the year and only non-material items remain unresolved from the earlier
reconciliations, so that we have adequate assurance that the accounts themselves can be robustly
constructed. We have agreement with the SSC that these will now be fully undertaken on a timely basis as
part of a routine schedule and, together with the other users, have agreed a more robust and stringent
reporting schedule.
The emphasis for business units and the SSC during 2009-10 has been on streamlining processes and
delivering transactions more efficiently to enable withdrawal of the ‘workarounds’ and achievement of
Service Level Agreement targets, such as prompt payment and purchase order compliance, together with
business case benefits. Whilst essential for SSC operational efficiency and delivery of business case
benefits, changes are only implemented after ensuring that they do not compromise the robustness of the
control environment.
The SSC provides monthly assessments of service levels and issues, discussed with DVLA at formal
monitoring meetings that I chair. In addition, there are monthly assessments of controls provided to
Information Asset Owners as part of the control processes. Work continues on refining the final elements